EPYC 7663 vs Ryzen 9 3900X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 3900X
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
21.10
EPYC 7663
2021
56 cores / 112 threads, 240 Watt
53.07
+152%

EPYC 7663 outperforms Ryzen 9 3900X by a whopping 152% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 7663 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24627
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation30.67no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Milan (2021)
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499$6,366

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 7663 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 7663 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)
Threads24112
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache768 KB3584 KB
L2 cache6 MB28 MB
L3 cache64 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors19,200 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 7663 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketAM4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 7663. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 7663 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 7663. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 7663.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 3900X 21.10
EPYC 7663 53.07
+152%

EPYC 7663 outperforms Ryzen 9 3900X by 152% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 9 3900X 32642
EPYC 7663 82087
+151%

EPYC 7663 outperforms Ryzen 9 3900X by 151% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.10 53.07
Recency 7 July 2019 12 January 2021
Physical cores 12 56
Threads 24 112
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 240 Watt

Ryzen 9 3900X has 128.6% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7663, on the other hand, has a 151.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 366.7% more physical cores and 366.7% more threads.

The EPYC 7663 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 3900X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 3900X is a desktop processor while EPYC 7663 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 3900X and EPYC 7663, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Ryzen 9 3900X
AMD EPYC 7663
EPYC 7663

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 5049 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate EPYC 7663 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 3900X or EPYC 7663, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.