Ryzen 7 5700 vs Ryzen 9 3900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 3900
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
20.12
+26.9%

Ryzen 9 3900 outperforms Ryzen 7 5700 by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 3900 and Ryzen 7 5700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking288449
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.2760.36
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Matisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop)no data
Power efficiency28.2322.25
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Cezanne (2021−2024)
Release date24 September 2019 (5 years ago)4 April 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499$179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 5700 has 184% better value for money than Ryzen 9 3900.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 3900 and Ryzen 7 5700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cache768 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache6 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB16 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm7 nm
Die size2x 74 mm2180 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors7,600 million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 3900 and Ryzen 7 5700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3900 and Ryzen 7 5700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3900 and Ryzen 7 5700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3900 and Ryzen 7 5700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 3900 and Ryzen 7 5700.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes2420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 3900 20.12
+26.9%
Ryzen 7 5700 15.86

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 3900 30796
+26.9%
Ryzen 7 5700 24268

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 9 3900 1678
Ryzen 7 5700 2016
+20.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 9 3900 9574
+8.5%
Ryzen 7 5700 8822

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.12 15.86
Recency 24 September 2019 4 April 2022
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 16

Ryzen 9 3900 has a 26.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Ryzen 7 5700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

The Ryzen 9 3900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 5700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 3900 and Ryzen 7 5700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 3900
Ryzen 9 3900
AMD Ryzen 7 5700
Ryzen 7 5700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 608 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 184 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 3900 or Ryzen 7 5700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.