EPYC 7262 vs Ryzen 9 3900

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 3900
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
20.12
+48.2%

Ryzen 9 3900 outperforms EPYC 7262 by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 3900 and EPYC 7262 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking289569
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation20.349.78
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Matisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop)AMD EPYC
Power efficiency28.237.99
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date24 September 2019 (5 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499$575

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 3900 has 108% better value for money than EPYC 7262.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 3900 and EPYC 7262 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplierno data32
L1 cache768 KB512 KB
L2 cache6 MB4 MB
L3 cache64 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size2x 74 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors7,600 million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 3900 and EPYC 7262 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketAM4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3900 and EPYC 7262. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3900 and EPYC 7262 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3900 and EPYC 7262. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 3900 and EPYC 7262.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes24128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 3900 20.12
+48.2%
EPYC 7262 13.58

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 3900 30796
+48.2%
EPYC 7262 20779

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.12 13.58
Recency 24 September 2019 7 August 2019
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 16
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 155 Watt

Ryzen 9 3900 has a 48.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and 138.5% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 3900 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7262 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 3900 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7262 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 3900 and EPYC 7262, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 3900
Ryzen 9 3900
AMD EPYC 7262
EPYC 7262

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 611 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 21 vote

Rate EPYC 7262 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 3900 or EPYC 7262, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.