5 120UL vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U and Core 5 120UL processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 441 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 52.63 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) |
| Release date | 3 May 2023 (1 year ago) | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U and Core 5 120UL basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U and Core 5 120UL compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U and Core 5 120UL. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U and Core 5 120UL technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U and Core 5 120UL are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U and Core 5 120UL. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz) | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U and Core 5 120UL.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 May 2023 | 8 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 10 |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U has 33.3% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.
5 120UL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, 25% more physical cores, and 86.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U and Core 5 120UL. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U is a notebook processor while Core 5 120UL is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U and Core 5 120UL, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
