Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
13.38
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 54 Watt
14.61
+9.2%

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking568498
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesRembrandt (Zen 3+)AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency44.3825.13
Architecture codenameRembrandt U (Zen 3+) (2022)Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)
Release date20 April 2022 (2 years ago)5 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed2.7 GHz4.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.75 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache512 KB384 KB
L2 cache4 MB6 MB
L3 cache16 MB16 MB
Chip lithography6 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP7no data
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt54 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 680MAMD Radeon 760M

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 13.38
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 14.61
+9.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 20863
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 22778
+9.2%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 1494
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 2269
+51.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 6528
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 8572
+31.3%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 6238
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 6888
+10.4%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 36959
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 39399
+6.6%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 23
+6.9%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 22

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 1992
+6.9%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 1863

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 233
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 249
+6.9%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 2.87
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 2.97
+3.5%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 7.7
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 10.4
+35.1%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 8734
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 8863
+1.5%

Blender(-)

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 274
+1.5%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 270

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 1452
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 1748
+20.4%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 5289
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 5892
+11.4%

7-Zip

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 52568
+2.9%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 51096

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 270
+3.1%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 262

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.38 14.61
Integrated graphics card 15.98 14.98
Recency 20 April 2022 5 January 2023
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 54 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z has 6.7% faster integrated GPU, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 92.9% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, on the other hand, has a 9.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 14 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z or Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.