Ryzen 7 6800HS vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
10.51
Ryzen 7 6800HS
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
15.01
+42.8%

Ryzen 7 6800HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Ryzen 7 6800HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking760490
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)no data
Power efficiency63.8939.11
Architecture codenameCezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022)Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022)
Release date19 April 2022 (2 years ago)January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Ryzen 7 6800HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm6 nm
Die size180 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
Number of transistors10,700 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Ryzen 7 6800HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6FP7
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Ryzen 7 6800HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Ryzen 7 6800HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Ryzen 7 6800HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)AMD Radeon 680M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Ryzen 7 6800HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U 10.51
Ryzen 7 6800HS 15.01
+42.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U 16078
Ryzen 7 6800HS 22974
+42.9%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U 1530
Ryzen 7 6800HS 1822
+19.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U 5269
Ryzen 7 6800HS 8693
+65%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.51 15.01
Integrated graphics card 9.02 15.98
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U has 133.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 6800HS, on the other hand, has a 42.8% higher aggregate performance score, 77.2% faster integrated GPU, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 6800HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Ryzen 7 6800HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
Ryzen 7 6800HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 187 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 6800HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U or Ryzen 7 6800HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.