A9-9410 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
10.12
+954%
A9-9410
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.96

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U outperforms A9-9410 by a whopping 954% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and A9-9410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7622493
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)AMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency63.856.06
Architecture codenameCezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date19 April 2022 (2 years ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and A9-9410 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed2 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm28 nm
Die size180 mm2125 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors10,700 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and A9-9410 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6FP4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and A9-9410. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTVirtualization,
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and A9-9410 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and A9-9410. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-2133
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data3
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and A9-9410 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and A9-9410 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and A9-9410.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes88

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U 10.12
+954%
A9-9410 0.96

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U 16078
+956%
A9-9410 1522

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.12 0.96
Recency 19 April 2022 31 May 2016
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U has a 954.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is our recommended choice as it beats the A9-9410 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and A9-9410, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
AMD A9-9410
A9-9410

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 113 votes

Rate A9-9410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U or A9-9410, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.