Xeon Platinum 8124M vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Platinum 8124M outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Xeon Platinum 8124M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 449 | 367 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 7 | Intel Xeon Platinum |
| Power efficiency | 22.37 | 6.78 |
| Architecture codename | Cezanne PRO (Zen 3) (2021) | Skylake (server) (2017−2019) |
| Release date | 1 June 2021 (3 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Xeon Platinum 8124M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 18 (Octadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 36 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.6 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 38 | 30 |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 1.125 MB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 18 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 24.75 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 180 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 10,700 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Xeon Platinum 8124M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 8 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | AM4 | Socket P |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 240 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Xeon Platinum 8124M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Xeon Platinum 8124M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Xeon Platinum 8124M are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Xeon Platinum 8124M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1,536 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | 128.001 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Xeon Platinum 8124M.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 15.43 | 17.27 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 18 |
| Threads | 16 | 36 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 240 Watt |
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 269.2% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8124M, on the other hand, has a 11.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 125% more physical cores and 125% more threads.
The Xeon Platinum 8124M is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8124M is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Xeon Platinum 8124M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
