Ryzen 3 2200G vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
15.38
+262%
Ryzen 3 2200G
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.25

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by a whopping 262% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 3 2200G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4501368
Place by popularitynot in top-10091
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data8.79
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency22.396.19
Architecture codenameCezanne PRO (Zen 3) (2021)Raven Ridge (2017−2018)
Release date1 June 2021 (3 years ago)12 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 3 2200G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier3835
L1 cache64K (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm14 nm
Die size180 mm2210 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors10,700 million4,950 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 3 2200G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 3 2200G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsPRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 3 2200G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 3 2200G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 3 2200G.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 15.38
+262%
Ryzen 3 2200G 4.25

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 24426
+262%
Ryzen 3 2200G 6756

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 1984
+98.8%
Ryzen 3 2200G 998

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 8288
+192%
Ryzen 3 2200G 2839

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 6432
+39.1%
Ryzen 3 2200G 4625

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 37998
+128%
Ryzen 3 2200G 16684

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 3.69
+193%
Ryzen 3 2200G 10.8

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 22
+234%
Ryzen 3 2200G 7

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 1956
+239%
Ryzen 3 2200G 577

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 241
+65.6%
Ryzen 3 2200G 146

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 2.87
+70.8%
Ryzen 3 2200G 1.68

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 11.1
+258%
Ryzen 3 2200G 3.1

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 113
+185%
Ryzen 3 2200G 40

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 250
+35.6%
Ryzen 3 2200G 184

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 7011
+117%
Ryzen 3 2200G 3229

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 8396
+72%
Ryzen 3 2200G 4882

Blender(-)

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 245
Ryzen 3 2200G 826
+237%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 1561
+43.7%
Ryzen 3 2200G 1087

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 5682
+43.9%
Ryzen 3 2200G 3948

7-Zip

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 57184
+287%
Ryzen 3 2200G 14790

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.38 4.25
Integrated graphics card 9.04 4.50
Recency 1 June 2021 12 February 2018
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G has a 261.9% higher aggregate performance score, 100.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 2200G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 3 2200G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Ryzen 3 2200G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 145 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2284 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 2200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G or Ryzen 3 2200G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.