Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
9.53
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2024
8 cores / 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c threads, 28 Watt
14.11
+48.1%

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking801521
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesRenoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency60.0947.66
Architecture codenameRenoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date7 May 2020 (4 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Base clock speed1.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Bus rateno data54 MHz
Multiplier17no data
L1 cache512 KBno data
L2 cache4 MBno data
L3 cache8 MBno data
Chip lithography7 nm4 nm
Die size156 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors9800 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP6FP8
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsPRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1600 MHz)AMD Radeon 880M

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 9.53
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 14.11
+48.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 15141
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 22406
+48%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 6153
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 10661
+73.3%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 4438
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 5417
+22.1%

7-Zip

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 39649
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 52491
+32.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.53 14.11
Integrated graphics card 7.47 20.07
Recency 7 May 2020 1 October 2024
Threads 16 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U has 86.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has a 48.1% higher aggregate performance score, 168.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 0% more threads, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 193 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U or Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.