Core i3-10100T vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U outperforms i3-10100T by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U and Core i3-10100T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1210 | 1225 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 20.08 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 7 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2020) | no data |
| Release date | 8 April 2019 (5 years ago) | 1 April 2020 (4 years ago) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U and Core i3-10100T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 8 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | no data |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4940 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U and Core i3-10100T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U and Core i3-10100T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U and Core i3-10100T are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U and Core i3-10100T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U and Core i3-10100T.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U outperforms Core i3-10100T by 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U outperforms Core i3-10100T by 1% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Core i3-10100T outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U by 34% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Core i3-10100T outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U by 26% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.81 | 4.74 |
| Recency | 8 April 2019 | 1 April 2020 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U has a 1.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 133.3% lower power consumption.
i3-10100T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U and Core i3-10100T.
Be aware that Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is a notebook processor while Core i3-10100T is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U and Core i3-10100T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
