Celeron N2820 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
9.25
+2791%
Celeron N2820
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.32

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 outperforms Celeron N2820 by a whopping 2791% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron N2820 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8233083
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7Intel Celeron
Power efficiency13.474.33
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)1 December 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron N2820 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed3 GHz2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz2.39 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache96K (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron N2820 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron N2820. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Smart Connectno data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron N2820 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron N2820 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron N2820. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency-756 MHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron N2820 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron N2820.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes204
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 9.25
+2791%
Celeron N2820 0.32

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 14693
+2810%
Celeron N2820 505

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 1036
+423%
Celeron N2820 198

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 5214
+1420%
Celeron N2820 343

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.25 0.32
Recency 29 June 2017 1 December 2013
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 7 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has a 2790.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron N2820, on the other hand, has 828.6% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2820 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N2820 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron N2820, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Intel Celeron N2820
Celeron N2820

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 99 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 45 votes

Rate Celeron N2820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 or Celeron N2820, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.