Celeron G6900T vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
9.28
+267%
Celeron G6900T
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
2.53

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 outperforms Celeron G6900T by a whopping 267% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron G6900T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8221738
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7no data
Power efficiency13.456.81
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron G6900T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed3 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache768 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors4800 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron G6900T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron G6900T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron G6900T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron G6900T are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron G6900T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel UHD Graphics 710
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency-1.3 GHz
Execution Units-16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron G6900T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron G6900T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4-4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP-5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort-7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron G6900T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX-12
OpenGL-4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron G6900T.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 9.28
+267%
Celeron G6900T 2.53

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 14693
+267%
Celeron G6900T 4003

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 1036
Celeron G6900T 1401
+35.2%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 5214
+112%
Celeron G6900T 2463

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.28 2.53
Recency 29 June 2017 4 January 2022
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has a 266.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Celeron G6900T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G6900T in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G6900T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Celeron G6900T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Intel Celeron G6900T
Celeron G6900T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 99 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 676 votes

Rate Celeron G6900T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 or Celeron G6900T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.