i7-14701E vs Ryzen 7 8840U
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 8840U and Core i7-14701E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 471 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 50.43 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 6 December 2023 (1 year ago) | July 2024 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 8840U and Core i7-14701E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 33 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | 257 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 25,000 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 8840U and Core i7-14701E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP8 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 8840U and Core i7-14701E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 8840U and Core i7-14701E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 8840U and Core i7-14701E are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 8840U and Core i7-14701E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz) | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 8840U and Core i7-14701E.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 18.35 | 6.16 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 65 Watt |
Ryzen 7 8840U has 197.9% faster integrated GPU, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 132.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 8840U and Core i7-14701E. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 7 8840U is a notebook processor while Core i7-14701E is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 8840U and Core i7-14701E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
