EPYC 9135 vs Ryzen 7 7840S

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 7840S
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
15.09
EPYC 9135
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
36.56
+142%

EPYC 9135 outperforms Ryzen 7 7840S by a whopping 142% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 7840S and EPYC 9135 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking46796
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data29.26
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesPhoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)no data
Power efficiency40.7817.29
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)Turin (2024)
Release date5 January 2023 (1 year ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,214

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 7840S and EPYC 9135 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache512 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm4 nm
Die size178 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data16,630 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 7840S and EPYC 9135 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8SP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and EPYC 9135. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsRyzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and EPYC 9135 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and EPYC 9135. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and EPYC 9135.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 7840S 15.09
EPYC 9135 36.56
+142%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 7840S 23966
EPYC 9135 58070
+142%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.09 36.56
Recency 5 January 2023 10 October 2024
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 200 Watt

Ryzen 7 7840S has 471.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9135, on the other hand, has a 142.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The EPYC 9135 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 7840S in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 7840S is a notebook processor while EPYC 9135 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7840S and EPYC 9135, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 7840S
Ryzen 7 7840S
AMD EPYC 9135
EPYC 9135

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 25 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9135 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 7840S or EPYC 9135, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.