Ultra 7 268V vs Ryzen 7 7840S

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 7840S
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
15.09
+72.3%
Core Ultra 7 268V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
8.76

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Core Ultra 7 268V by an impressive 72% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 7840S and Core Ultra 7 268V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking467873
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPhoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)no data
Power efficiency40.8048.77
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date5 January 2023 (1 year ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 7840S and Core Ultra 7 268V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz5 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cache512 KB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm3 nm
Die size178 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 7840S and Core Ultra 7 268V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Core Ultra 7 268V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsRyzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 7840S and Core Ultra 7 268V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Core Ultra 7 268V are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Core Ultra 7 268V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)Arc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Core Ultra 7 268V.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 7840S 15.09
+72.3%
Ultra 7 268V 8.76

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 7840S 23966
+72.2%
Ultra 7 268V 13916

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 7840S 11288
+15.6%
Ultra 7 268V 9766

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 7840S 12598
+15.5%
Ultra 7 268V 10911

Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 7840S 2605
+0.9%
Ultra 7 268V 2583

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.09 8.76
Recency 5 January 2023 24 September 2024
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 4 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 17 Watt

Ryzen 7 7840S has a 72.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Ultra 7 268V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 105.9% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 7840S is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 7 268V in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7840S and Core Ultra 7 268V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 7840S
Ryzen 7 7840S
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Core Ultra 7 268V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 25 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 5 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 268V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 7840S or Core Ultra 7 268V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.