Apple M2 Pro vs Ryzen 7 7840S

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 7840S
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
15.09
+9.9%
Apple M2 Pro
2023
12 cores / 12 threads
13.73

Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Apple M2 Pro by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 7840S and M2 Pro processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking467544
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesPhoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)Apple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency40.80no data
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)no data
Release date5 January 2023 (1 year ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 7840S and M2 Pro basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache512 KB3.3 MB
L2 cache8 MB36 MB
L3 cache16 MB24 MB
Chip lithography4 nm5 nm
Die size178 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data40000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 7840S and M2 Pro compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and M2 Pro. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsRyzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and M2 Pro. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 7840S 15.09
+9.9%
Apple M2 Pro 13.73

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 7840S 23966
+9.9%
Apple M2 Pro 21802

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 7840S 2223
+7.4%
Apple M2 Pro 2069

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 7840S 274
+19.1%
Apple M2 Pro 230

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 7840S 11288
Apple M2 Pro 15010
+33%

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 7 7840S 296
Apple M2 Pro 386
+30.4%

CrossMark Overall

Ryzen 7 7840S 1655
Apple M2 Pro 1805
+9%

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ryzen 7 7840S 248
Apple M2 Pro 253
+2.2%

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 7840S 12598
Apple M2 Pro 14568
+15.6%

Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 7840S 2605
Apple M2 Pro 2663
+2.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.09 13.73
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm

Ryzen 7 7840S has a 9.9% higher aggregate performance score, 33.3% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

Apple M2 Pro, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 7 7840S and M2 Pro.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7840S and Apple M2 Pro, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 7840S
Ryzen 7 7840S
Apple M2 Pro
M2 Pro

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 25 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 182 votes

Rate M2 Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 7840S or M2 Pro, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.