Threadripper PRO 7945WX vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 7840HS and Threadripper PRO 7945WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 326 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 49.21 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| Release date | January 2023 (1 year ago) | 19 October 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,399 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 7840HS and Threadripper PRO 7945WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | 2x 71 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 25,000 million | 13,140 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 7840HS and Threadripper PRO 7945WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP8 | sTR5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7840HS and Threadripper PRO 7945WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7840HS and Threadripper PRO 7945WX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7840HS and Threadripper PRO 7945WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 780M | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7840HS and Threadripper PRO 7945WX.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 8 | 12 |
| Threads | 16 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 350 Watt |
Ryzen 7 7840HS has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.
Threadripper PRO 7945WX, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 7840HS and Threadripper PRO 7945WX. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 7 7840HS is a notebook processor while Threadripper PRO 7945WX is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7840HS and Threadripper PRO 7945WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
