Processor U300E vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 7840HS and Processor U300E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 328 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 49.23 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Raptor Lake-U (2023) |
| Release date | January 2023 (1 year ago) | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 7840HS and Processor U300E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 5 (Penta-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 25,000 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 7840HS and Processor U300E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP8 | Intel BGA 1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7840HS and Processor U300E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 7840HS and Processor U300E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7840HS and Processor U300E are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7840HS and Processor U300E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon 780M | Intel UHD Graphics 48EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7840HS and Processor U300E.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 8 | 5 |
| Threads | 16 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 7 7840HS has 60% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.
Processor U300E, on the other hand, has 133.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 7840HS and Processor U300E. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7840HS and Processor U300E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
