Xeon Silver 4214 vs Ryzen 7 7840H

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 7840H
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
17.87
+75.4%
Xeon Silver 4214
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 85 Watt
10.19

Ryzen 7 7840H outperforms Xeon Silver 4214 by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 7840H and Xeon Silver 4214 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking342757
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data18.01
Market segmentLaptopServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Silver
Power efficiency48.3211.35
Architecture codenamePhoenix (2023−2024)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release dateJanuary 2023 (1 year ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$694

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 7840H and Xeon Silver 4214 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1624
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache64K (per core)768 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)12 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16.5 MB
Chip lithography4 nm14 nm
Die size178 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data77 °C
Number of transistors25,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 7840H and Xeon Silver 4214 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFP8FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7840H and Xeon Silver 4214. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 7840H and Xeon Silver 4214 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7840H and Xeon Silver 4214 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7840H and Xeon Silver 4214. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600DDR4-2400
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 780Mno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7840H and Xeon Silver 4214.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes2048

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 7840H 17.87
+75.4%
Xeon Silver 4214 10.19

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 7840H 28390
+75.4%
Xeon Silver 4214 16190

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.87 10.19
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 16 24
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 85 Watt

Ryzen 7 7840H has a 75.4% higher aggregate performance score, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 142.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon Silver 4214, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

The Ryzen 7 7840H is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4214 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 7840H is a notebook processor while Xeon Silver 4214 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7840H and Xeon Silver 4214, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 7840H
Ryzen 7 7840H
Intel Xeon Silver 4214
Xeon Silver 4214

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 266 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 22 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4214 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 7840H or Xeon Silver 4214, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.