Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 7735H

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 7735H
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
15.04
+81.2%
Ryzen 5 2600
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
8.30

Ryzen 7 7735H outperforms Ryzen 5 2600 by an impressive 81% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 5 2600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking467903
Place by popularitynot in top-10022
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.80
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency40.6712.08
Architecture codenameRembrandt-H Refresh (2023)Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018)
Release date1 April 2023 (1 year ago)19 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 5 2600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.75 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data34
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)3 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography6 nm12 nm
Die size208 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 5 2600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP7AM4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 5 2600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 5 2600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 5 2600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 680M-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 5 2600.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 7735H 15.04
+81.2%
Ryzen 5 2600 8.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 7735H 23898
+81.2%
Ryzen 5 2600 13189

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 7 7735H 6438
+36.2%
Ryzen 5 2600 4726

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 7 7735H 35222
+25%
Ryzen 5 2600 28173

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 7 7735H 12924
+39.1%
Ryzen 5 2600 9290

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 7 7735H 3.81
+44.4%
Ryzen 5 2600 5.5

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 7 7735H 21
+54.2%
Ryzen 5 2600 14

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 7735H 1825
+46.2%
Ryzen 5 2600 1248

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 7735H 246
+56.4%
Ryzen 5 2600 157

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 7735H 2.91
+65.3%
Ryzen 5 2600 1.76

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 7 7735H 10.6
+41.3%
Ryzen 5 2600 7.5

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 7 7735H 104
+38.2%
Ryzen 5 2600 75

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 7 7735H 252
+22.5%
Ryzen 5 2600 205

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 7 7735H 5997
+32.8%
Ryzen 5 2600 4517

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 7735H 8582
+41.4%
Ryzen 5 2600 6070

Blender(-)

Ryzen 7 7735H 283
Ryzen 5 2600 375
+32.5%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 7735H 1564
+39.8%
Ryzen 5 2600 1119

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 7 7735H 5621
+39.8%
Ryzen 5 2600 4020

7-Zip

Ryzen 7 7735H 52518
+70%
Ryzen 5 2600 30898

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 7 7735H 293
+63.7%
Ryzen 5 2600 179

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.04 8.30
Recency 1 April 2023 19 April 2018
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 6 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 7 7735H has a 81.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 7735H is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 2600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 7735H is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 2600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7735H and Ryzen 5 2600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 7735H
Ryzen 7 7735H
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 5 2600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 249 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7735H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 14959 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 7735H or Ryzen 5 2600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.