Atom x7-E3950 vs Ryzen 7 7735H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 7735H
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
14.95
+1189%
Atom x7-E3950
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.16

Ryzen 7 7735H outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by a whopping 1189% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 7735H and Atom x7-E3950 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4712378
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno data7x Intel Atom
Power efficiency40.719.21
Architecture codenameRembrandt-H Refresh (2023)Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release date1 April 2023 (1 year ago)30 August 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$57

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 7735H and Atom x7-E3950 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed3.2 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.75 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography6 nm14 nm
Die size208 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature95 °C110 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data103 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 7735H and Atom x7-E3950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP7Intel BGA 1296
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Atom x7-E3950. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 7735H and Atom x7-E3950 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Atom x7-E3950 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Atom x7-E3950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 505 (500 - 650 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7735H and Atom x7-E3950.

PCIe version4.02.0
PCI Express lanes204

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 7735H 14.95
+1189%
Atom x7-E3950 1.16

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 7735H 23950
+1185%
Atom x7-E3950 1864

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 7 7735H 6438
+394%
Atom x7-E3950 1304

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 7 7735H 35222
+835%
Atom x7-E3950 3769

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 7 7735H 12924
+501%
Atom x7-E3950 2152

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 7 7735H 3.81
+694%
Atom x7-E3950 30.26

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 7 7735H 21
+1213%
Atom x7-E3950 2

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 7735H 1825
+1360%
Atom x7-E3950 125

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 7735H 246
+500%
Atom x7-E3950 41

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 7735H 2.91
+471%
Atom x7-E3950 0.51

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 7 7735H 10.6
+960%
Atom x7-E3950 1

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 7 7735H 104
+1027%
Atom x7-E3950 9

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 7 7735H 252
+458%
Atom x7-E3950 45

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 7 7735H 5997
+727%
Atom x7-E3950 725

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.95 1.16
Integrated graphics card 14.12 0.94
Recency 1 April 2023 30 August 2014
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 6 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 12 Watt

Ryzen 7 7735H has a 1188.8% higher aggregate performance score, 1402.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

Atom x7-E3950, on the other hand, has 191.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 7735H is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x7-E3950 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7735H and Atom x7-E3950, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 7735H
Ryzen 7 7735H
Intel Atom x7-E3950
Atom x7-E3950

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 256 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7735H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 48 votes

Rate Atom x7-E3950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 7735H or Atom x7-E3950, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.