Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Ryzen 7 7730U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 7730U
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
11.65
Ryzen 7 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
18.20
+56.2%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7730U by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 7730U and Ryzen 7 7840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking671333
Place by popularity100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency73.5049.21
Architecture codenameBarcelo-U Refresh (2023)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 7730U and Ryzen 7 7840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm4 nm
Die size180 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
Number of transistors10,700 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 7730U and Ryzen 7 7840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6FP8
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7730U and Ryzen 7 7840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMERyzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7730U and Ryzen 7 7840HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7730U and Ryzen 7 7840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7730U and Ryzen 7 7840HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 7730U 11.65
Ryzen 7 7840HS 18.20
+56.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 7730U 18512
Ryzen 7 7840HS 28912
+56.2%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 7730U 1643
Ryzen 7 7840HS 2367
+44.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 7730U 6352
Ryzen 7 7840HS 11009
+73.3%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 7 7730U 6243
Ryzen 7 7840HS 7642
+22.4%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 7 7730U 32670
Ryzen 7 7840HS 47933
+46.7%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 7 7730U 4.37
Ryzen 7 7840HS 2.64
+65.5%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 7 7730U 19
Ryzen 7 7840HS 30
+57.3%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 7730U 1830
Ryzen 7 7840HS 2573
+40.6%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 7730U 231
Ryzen 7 7840HS 279
+20.6%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 7730U 2.76
Ryzen 7 7840HS 3.31
+19.9%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 7 7730U 10.1
Ryzen 7 7840HS 14.8
+46.5%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 7 7730U 5881
Ryzen 7 7840HS 7064
+20.1%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 7 7730U 91
Ryzen 7 7840HS 147
+61.4%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 7 7730U 236
Ryzen 7 7840HS 290
+22.7%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 7730U 7573
Ryzen 7 7840HS 11874
+56.8%

Blender(-)

Ryzen 7 7730U 296
+51%
Ryzen 7 7840HS 196

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 7730U 1480
Ryzen 7 7840HS 1964
+32.7%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 7 7730U 5356
Ryzen 7 7840HS 6618
+23.6%

7-Zip

Ryzen 7 7730U 49425
Ryzen 7 7840HS 70330
+42.3%

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 7 7730U 263
Ryzen 7 7840HS 321
+22.1%

CrossMark Overall

Ryzen 7 7730U 1321
Ryzen 7 7840HS 1801
+36.3%

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ryzen 7 7730U 211
Ryzen 7 7840HS 263
+24.9%

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ryzen 7 7730U 500
+56.8%
Ryzen 7 7840HS 319

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 7730U 7013
Ryzen 7 7840HS 13112
+87%

Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 7730U 1960
Ryzen 7 7840HS 2670
+36.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.65 18.20
Integrated graphics card 9.05 18.32
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 7 7730U has 133.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 7840HS, on the other hand, has a 56.2% higher aggregate performance score, 102.4% faster integrated GPU, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 7730U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7730U and Ryzen 7 7840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 7730U
Ryzen 7 7730U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
Ryzen 7 7840HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1056 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7730U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 1686 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 7730U or Ryzen 7 7840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.