Ryzen 7 5825U vs Ryzen 7 6800U

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 6800U
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
12.96
+12.2%
Ryzen 7 5825U
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
11.55

Ryzen 7 6800U outperforms Ryzen 7 5825U by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 6800U and Ryzen 7 5825U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking590681
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency81.7772.87
Architecture codenameRembrandt-U (Zen 3+) (2022)Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022)
Release dateJanuary 2022 (2 years ago)6 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 6800U and Ryzen 7 5825U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography6 nm7 nm
Die size208 mm2180 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 6800U and Ryzen 7 5825U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP7FP6
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 6800U and Ryzen 7 5825U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 6800U and Ryzen 7 5825U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 6800U and Ryzen 7 5825U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 6800U and Ryzen 7 5825U.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 6800U 12.96
+12.2%
Ryzen 7 5825U 11.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 6800U 20584
+12.2%
Ryzen 7 5825U 18339

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 6800U 1714
Ryzen 7 5825U 1725
+0.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 6800U 7420
+16.5%
Ryzen 7 5825U 6367

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 7 6800U 6450
+2.3%
Ryzen 7 5825U 6304

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 7 6800U 35314
+8.2%
Ryzen 7 5825U 32641

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 7 6800U 9965
Ryzen 7 5825U 11292
+13.3%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 7 6800U 4.54
+103%
Ryzen 7 5825U 9.2

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 7 6800U 21
+13.8%
Ryzen 7 5825U 19

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 6800U 1776
Ryzen 7 5825U 1778
+0.1%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 6800U 242
+4.5%
Ryzen 7 5825U 232

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 6800U 2.88
+4.7%
Ryzen 7 5825U 2.75

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 7 6800U 10.7
+23%
Ryzen 7 5825U 8.7

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 7 6800U 4639
Ryzen 7 5825U 5835
+25.8%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 7 6800U 101
+0.7%
Ryzen 7 5825U 100

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 7 6800U 220
Ryzen 7 5825U 250
+13.7%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 6800U 7678
+13.2%
Ryzen 7 5825U 6782

Blender(-)

Ryzen 7 6800U 304
+0.5%
Ryzen 7 5825U 303

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 6800U 1514
+3.1%
Ryzen 7 5825U 1468

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 7 6800U 5453
+0.3%
Ryzen 7 5825U 5437

7-Zip

Ryzen 7 6800U 50614
+6.4%
Ryzen 7 5825U 47589

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 7 6800U 270
+1.3%
Ryzen 7 5825U 267

CrossMark Overall

Ryzen 7 6800U 1481
+13%
Ryzen 7 5825U 1311

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ryzen 7 6800U 213
Ryzen 7 5825U 213

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ryzen 7 6800U 504
Ryzen 7 5825U 543
+7.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.96 11.55
Integrated graphics card 15.33 9.05
Chip lithography 6 nm 7 nm

Ryzen 7 6800U has a 12.2% higher aggregate performance score, 69.4% faster integrated GPU, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 6800U is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 5825U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 6800U and Ryzen 7 5825U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
Ryzen 7 6800U
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U
Ryzen 7 5825U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 317 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 6800U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 717 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5825U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 6800U or Ryzen 7 5825U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.