Xeon E3-1278L v4 vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 6800HS and Xeon E3-1278L v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 492 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Power efficiency | 39.11 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) | Broadwell-DT (2015) |
| Release date | January 2022 (2 years ago) | 2 June 2015 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 6800HS and Xeon E3-1278L v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.7 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 208 mm2 | 182 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 6800HS and Xeon E3-1278L v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP7 | Intel BGA 1364 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 47 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 6800HS and Xeon E3-1278L v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 6800HS and Xeon E3-1278L v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 6800HS and Xeon E3-1278L v4 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 6800HS and Xeon E3-1278L v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR3-1600 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 680M | Intel Iris Pro P6300 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 6800HS and Xeon E3-1278L v4.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 47 Watt |
Ryzen 7 6800HS has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 34.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 6800HS and Xeon E3-1278L v4. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 7 6800HS is a notebook processor while Xeon E3-1278L v4 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 6800HS and Xeon E3-1278L v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
