Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 5800X3D
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
17.82
+5.9%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
16.83

Ryzen 7 5800X3D outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 5800X3D and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking348392
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation29.72no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency16.0645.51
Architecture codenameVermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date20 April 2022 (2 years ago)13 June 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 5800X3D and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache512 KB512 KB
L2 cache4 MB8 MB
L3 cache96 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm4 nm
Die size74 + 125 mm178 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors8,850 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 5800X3D and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM4FP7/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 5800X3D and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 5800X3D and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 5800X3D and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200no data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 5800X3D and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 5800X3D 17.82
+5.9%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 16.83

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 5800X3D 28311
+5.9%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 26730

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 5800X3D 2118
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2228
+5.2%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 5800X3D 11077
+4.2%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 10627

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 7 5800X3D 14479
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 14772
+2%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 5800X3D 2413
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2440
+1.1%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 5800X3D 241
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 269
+11.6%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 5800X3D 10856
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 11037
+1.7%

Blender(-)

Ryzen 7 5800X3D 213
+4.7%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 203

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 5800X3D 1622
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 1888
+16.4%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 7 5800X3D 6799
+4.7%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 6496

7-Zip

Ryzen 7 5800X3D 69518
+4.6%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 66442

CrossMark Overall

Ryzen 7 5800X3D 1770
+9.3%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 1620

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.82 16.83
Recency 20 April 2022 13 June 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 7 5800X3D has a 5.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 7 5800X3D and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS.

Note that Ryzen 7 5800X3D is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 5800X3D and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2246 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5800X3D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 58 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 5800X3D or Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.