7 160UL vs Ryzen 7 5700X3D
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 5700X3D and Core 7 160UL processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 389 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 78 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 46.10 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 14.94 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Vermeer (2020−2024) | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) |
| Release date | 8 January 2024 (less than a year ago) | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 5700X3D and Core 7 160UL basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 96 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 74 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 8,850 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 5700X3D and Core 7 160UL compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 5700X3D and Core 7 160UL. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 5700X3D and Core 7 160UL technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 5700X3D and Core 7 160UL are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 5700X3D and Core 7 160UL. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 5700X3D and Core 7 160UL.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 January 2024 | 8 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 10 |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 7 5700X3D has 33.3% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
7 160UL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, 25% more physical cores, and 600% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 5700X3D and Core 7 160UL. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 5700X3D and Core 7 160UL, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
