Ryzen 5 7535HS vs Ryzen 7 4800H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 4800H
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
11.62
+0.4%
Ryzen 5 7535HS
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 35 Watt
11.57

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 4800H and Ryzen 5 7535HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking673679
Place by popularity9023
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)no data
Power efficiency24.4431.28
Architecture codenameRenoir-H (Zen 2) (2020)Rembrandt-R (2023)
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 4800H and Ryzen 5 7535HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4.55 GHz
Multiplier29no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm6 nm
Die size156 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
Number of transistors9,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 4800H and Ryzen 5 7535HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6FP7
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 4800H and Ryzen 5 7535HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 4800H and Ryzen 5 7535HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 4800H and Ryzen 5 7535HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1600 MHz)AMD Radeon 660M ( - 1900 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 4800H and Ryzen 5 7535HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 4800H 11.62
+0.4%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 11.57

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 4800H 18463
+0.5%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 18379

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 4800H 1486
Ryzen 5 7535HS 1763
+18.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 4800H 6084
Ryzen 5 7535HS 6969
+14.5%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 7 4800H 5684
Ryzen 5 7535HS 6257
+10.1%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 7 4800H 37276
Ryzen 5 7535HS 37321
+0.1%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 7 4800H 12683
+3.6%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 12242

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 7 4800H 3.38
+149%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 8.4

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 7 4800H 21
+4.8%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 20

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 4800H 1854
+15.4%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 1607

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 4800H 188
Ryzen 5 7535HS 237
+25.8%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 4800H 2.18
Ryzen 5 7535HS 2.79
+28%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 7 4800H 10.3
+1%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 10.2

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 7 4800H 4601
Ryzen 5 7535HS 6586
+43.1%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 7 4800H 103
Ryzen 5 7535HS 104
+1.1%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 7 4800H 216
Ryzen 5 7535HS 258
+19.7%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 4800H 7955
+5.8%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 7521

Blender(-)

Ryzen 7 4800H 262
Ryzen 5 7535HS 377
+43.7%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 4800H 1191
Ryzen 5 7535HS 1492
+25.2%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 7 4800H 4686
Ryzen 5 7535HS 5438
+16%

7-Zip

Ryzen 7 4800H 50075
+11.7%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 44821

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 7 4800H 219
Ryzen 5 7535HS 235
+7.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.62 11.57
Integrated graphics card 7.47 16.31
Recency 6 January 2020 4 January 2023
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 7 4800H has a 0.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

Ryzen 5 7535HS, on the other hand, has 118.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 28.6% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 7 4800H and Ryzen 5 7535HS.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 4800H and Ryzen 5 7535HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
Ryzen 7 4800H
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS
Ryzen 5 7535HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3368 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 4800H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1508 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7535HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 4800H or Ryzen 5 7535HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.