EPYC 9454P vs Ryzen 7 3800X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 3800X
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
14.56
EPYC 9454P
2022
48 cores / 96 threads, 290 Watt
60.35
+314%

EPYC 9454P outperforms Ryzen 7 3800X by a whopping 314% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 3800X and EPYC 9454P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking49516
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.449.57
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD EPYC
Power efficiency13.1119.68
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399$4,598

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 3800X has 72% better value for money than EPYC 9454P.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 3800X and EPYC 9454P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads1696
Base clock speed3.9 GHz2.75 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.8 GHz
Multiplierno data27.5
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data8x 72 mm2
Number of transistors19,200 million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 3800X and EPYC 9454P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt290 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 3800X and EPYC 9454P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 3800X and EPYC 9454P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 3800X and EPYC 9454P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size128 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 3800X and EPYC 9454P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 3800X 14.56
EPYC 9454P 60.35
+314%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 3800X 23125
EPYC 9454P 95863
+315%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 3800X 1702
EPYC 9454P 1973
+15.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 3800X 8223
EPYC 9454P 19121
+133%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.56 60.35
Recency 7 July 2019 10 November 2022
Physical cores 8 48
Threads 16 96
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 290 Watt

Ryzen 7 3800X has 176.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9454P, on the other hand, has a 314.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9454P is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 3800X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 3800X is a desktop processor while EPYC 9454P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 3800X and EPYC 9454P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Ryzen 7 3800X
AMD EPYC 9454P
EPYC 9454P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 1756 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3800X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 10 votes

Rate EPYC 9454P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 3800X or EPYC 9454P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.