Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U vs Ryzen 7 2800H

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 2800H
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
5.24
+14.4%

Ryzen 7 2800H outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 2800H and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12081326
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency10.6227.84
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (Zen) (2018)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date10 September 2018 (6 years ago)8 April 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 2800H and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplier3321
L1 cache384 KB384 KB
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die size209.78 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors4950 Million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 2800H and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP5FP5
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 2800H and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHAXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 2800H and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 2800H and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 2800H and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1212

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 2800H 5.24
+14.4%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 4.58

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 2800H 8013
+14.3%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 7009

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.24 4.58
Integrated graphics card 5.48 4.50
Recency 10 September 2018 8 April 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 7 2800H has a 14.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 21.8% faster integrated GPU.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 2800H is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 2800H and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 2800H
Ryzen 7 2800H
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 14 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2800H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 141 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 2800H or Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.