Ryzen 5 4600U vs Ryzen 7 2700X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 2700X
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
11.02
+30%
Ryzen 5 4600U
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
8.48

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Ryzen 5 4600U by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 4600U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking709901
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.31no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Power efficiency9.9353.47
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021)
Release date19 April 2018 (6 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 4600U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.35 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3721
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm7 nm
Die size192 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 4600U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FP6
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 4600U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHAMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 4600U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 4600U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s68.27 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 4600U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 2700X 11.02
+30%
Ryzen 5 4600U 8.48

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 2700X 17509
+30%
Ryzen 5 4600U 13466

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 2700X 1254
Ryzen 5 4600U 1349
+7.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 2700X 6118
+30.3%
Ryzen 5 4600U 4694

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 2700X 1762
+61.8%
Ryzen 5 4600U 1089

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 2700X 176
+0.1%
Ryzen 5 4600U 176

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 2700X 7022
+25.6%
Ryzen 5 4600U 5591

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 2700X 1177
+6.5%
Ryzen 5 4600U 1105

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 7 2700X 4647
+9.4%
Ryzen 5 4600U 4247

7-Zip

Ryzen 7 2700X 45814
+31.4%
Ryzen 5 4600U 34854

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.02 8.48
Recency 19 April 2018 6 January 2020
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 7 2700X has a 30% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

Ryzen 5 4600U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 600% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 2700X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 4600U in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 2700X is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 4600U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 4600U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Ryzen 7 2700X
AMD Ryzen 5 4600U
Ryzen 5 4600U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2968 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 125 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 4600U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 2700X or Ryzen 5 4600U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.