Celeron 827 vs Ryzen 7 2700X Gold Edition
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 2700X Gold Edition and Celeron 827 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | AMD Ryzen 7 | Intel Celeron |
Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
Release date | 29 April 2019 (5 years ago) | no data |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 2700X Gold Edition and Celeron 827 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 16 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 4 × 5 GT/s |
Multiplier | 37 | 14 |
L1 cache | 768 KB | 64 KB |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 256 KB |
L3 cache | 16 MB | 1.5 MB |
Chip lithography | 12 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 213 mm2 | 131 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 4800 Million | 504 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 2700X Gold Edition and Celeron 827 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | Socket AM4 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 2700X Gold Edition and Celeron 827. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 2700X Gold Edition and Celeron 827 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 2700X Gold Edition and Celeron 827. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR3-1333 |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 16 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | 21.335 GB/s |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | - | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 2700X Gold Edition and Celeron 827.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 8 | 1 |
Threads | 16 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 12 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 17 Watt |
Ryzen 7 2700X Gold Edition has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron 827, on the other hand, has 517.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 2700X Gold Edition and Celeron 827. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 7 2700X Gold Edition is a desktop processor while Celeron 827 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 2700X Gold Edition and Celeron 827, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.