Ryzen 5 4600U vs Ryzen 7 2700U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 2700U
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.28
Ryzen 5 4600U
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 25 Watt
8.48
+98.1%

Ryzen 5 4600U outperforms Ryzen 7 2700U by an impressive 98% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 2700U and Ryzen 5 4600U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1365890
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Power efficiency27.0032.10
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021)
Release date26 October 2017 (7 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 2700U and Ryzen 5 4600U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4 GHz
Multiplier2221
L1 cache128K (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)11 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die size246 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors4950 Million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 2700U and Ryzen 5 4600U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5FP6
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 2700U and Ryzen 5 4600U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 2700U and Ryzen 5 4600U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 2700U and Ryzen 5 4600U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB64 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s68.27 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1300 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 2700U and Ryzen 5 4600U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 2700U 4.28
Ryzen 5 4600U 8.48
+98.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 2700U 6797
Ryzen 5 4600U 13466
+98.1%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 2700U 817
Ryzen 5 4600U 1336
+63.5%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 2700U 2466
Ryzen 5 4600U 4718
+91.3%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 2700U 644
Ryzen 5 4600U 1089
+69.1%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 2700U 144
Ryzen 5 4600U 176
+22.3%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 2700U 2969
Ryzen 5 4600U 5591
+88.3%

Blender(-)

Ryzen 7 2700U 713
+77.4%
Ryzen 5 4600U 402

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 2700U 813
Ryzen 5 4600U 1105
+35.9%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 7 2700U 3592
Ryzen 5 4600U 4247
+18.2%

7-Zip

Ryzen 7 2700U 17317
Ryzen 5 4600U 34854
+101%

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 7 2700U 142
Ryzen 5 4600U 199
+40.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.28 8.48
Integrated graphics card 4.23 6.04
Recency 26 October 2017 6 January 2020
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

Ryzen 7 2700U has 66.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 4600U, on the other hand, has a 98.1% higher aggregate performance score, 42.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 4600U is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 2700U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 2700U and Ryzen 5 4600U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
Ryzen 7 2700U
AMD Ryzen 5 4600U
Ryzen 5 4600U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 201 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 2700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 125 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 4600U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 2700U or Ryzen 5 4600U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.