Ryzen 9 3950X vs Ryzen 7 2700E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 2700E
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
9.23
Ryzen 9 3950X
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 105 Watt
24.37
+164%

Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms Ryzen 7 2700E by a whopping 164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 2700E and Ryzen 9 3950X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking832210
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data18.76
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD Ryzen 9
Power efficiency13.4421.96
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release date19 September 2018 (6 years ago)14 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 2700E and Ryzen 9 3950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier28no data
L1 cache96K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)64 MB
Chip lithography12 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size192 mm22 x 72 mm + 125 mm (IO-Die) mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 2700E and Ryzen 9 3950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 2700E and Ryzen 9 3950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 2700E and Ryzen 9 3950X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 2700E and Ryzen 9 3950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card--

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 2700E and Ryzen 9 3950X.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 2700E 9.23
Ryzen 9 3950X 24.37
+164%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 2700E 14657
Ryzen 9 3950X 38715
+164%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.23 24.37
Recency 19 September 2018 14 November 2019
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 105 Watt

Ryzen 7 2700E has 61.5% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 3950X, on the other hand, has a 164% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 3950X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 2700E in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 2700E and Ryzen 9 3950X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
Ryzen 7 2700E
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Ryzen 9 3950X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 35 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 728 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 2700E or Ryzen 9 3950X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.