i5-14600KF vs Ryzen 7 2700E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 2700E
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
9.58
Core i5-14600KF
2023
14 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
25.67
+168%

Core i5-14600KF outperforms Ryzen 7 2700E by a whopping 168% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 2700E and Core i5-14600KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking824198
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data67.26
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7no data
Power efficiency19.4118.73
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024)
Release date10 September 2018 (6 years ago)17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$294

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 2700E and Core i5-14600KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads1620
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5.3 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier28no data
L1 cache768 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size213 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors4800 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 2700E and Core i5-14600KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 2700E and Core i5-14600KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 2700E and Core i5-14600KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 2700E and Core i5-14600KF are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 2700E and Core i5-14600KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size64 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 2700E and Core i5-14600KF.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 2700E 9.58
i5-14600KF 25.67
+168%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 2700E 14657
i5-14600KF 39279
+168%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.58 25.67
Recency 10 September 2018 17 October 2023
Physical cores 8 14
Threads 16 20
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 125 Watt

Ryzen 7 2700E has 177.8% lower power consumption.

i5-14600KF, on the other hand, has a 168% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and 75% more physical cores and 25% more threads.

The Core i5-14600KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 2700E in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 2700E and Core i5-14600KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
Ryzen 7 2700E
Intel Core i5-14600KF
Core i5-14600KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 34 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 762 votes

Rate Core i5-14600KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 2700E or Core i5-14600KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.