Athlon MP 2200+ vs Ryzen 7 2700
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 2700 and Athlon MP 2200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 771 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 9.09 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 7 | AMD Athlon MP |
| Power efficiency | 14.39 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2019) | K7 (2000−2004) |
| Release date | 19 April 2018 (6 years ago) | 27 August 2002 (22 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | $224 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 2700 and Athlon MP 2200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 266 MT/s |
| Multiplier | 32 | 13.5 |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | 85 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 37 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 2700 and Athlon MP 2200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | AM4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 60 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 2700 and Athlon MP 2200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 2700 and Athlon MP 2200+ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 2700 and Athlon MP 2200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 4 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 2700 and Athlon MP 2200+.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 19 April 2018 | 27 August 2002 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 1 |
| Threads | 16 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 60 Watt |
Ryzen 7 2700 has an age advantage of 15 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon MP 2200+, on the other hand, has 8.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 2700 and Athlon MP 2200+. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 7 2700 is a desktop processor while Athlon MP 2200+ is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 2700 and Athlon MP 2200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
