Celeron M 560 vs Ryzen 7 1700X

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron M 560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	775	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.67	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	AMD Ryzen 7	Intel Celeron M
Power efficiency	9.83	no data
Architecture codename	Zen (2017−2020)	Merom (2006−2008)
Release date	22 February 2017 (7 years ago)	1 May 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron M 560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	8 (Octa-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	16	1
Base clock speed	3.4 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	3.8 GHz	2.13 GHz
Bus rate	4 × 8 GT/s	533 MHz
Multiplier	34	no data
L1 cache	768 KB	64 KB
L2 cache	4096 KB	1 MB
L3 cache	16384 KB	no data
Chip lithography	14 nm	65 nm
Die size	213 mm2	143 mm2
Maximum core temperature	no data	100 °C
Number of transistors	4800 Million	291 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	+	-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron M 560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	no data
Socket	AM4	PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron M 560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT	no data
AES-NI	+	-
FMA	FMA3	-
AVX	+	-
XFR	+	-
SenseMI	+	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron M 560 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron M 560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4	no data
Maximum memory size	64 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	42.671 GB/s	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron M 560.

PCIe version	n/a	no data
PCI Express lanes	20	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	22 February 2017	1 May 2008
Physical cores	8	1
Threads	16	1
Chip lithography	14 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	30 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron M 560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---