Celeron 787 vs Ryzen 7 1700X

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron 787 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking777not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.58no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7Intel Celeron
Power efficiency9.83no data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date22 February 2017 (7 years ago)1 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron 787 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads161
Base clock speed3.4 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplier3413
L1 cache768 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache16384 KB1.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size213 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors4800 Million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron 787 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron 787. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA3+
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
XFR+-
SenseMI+-

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron 787 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron 787 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron 787. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency-950 MHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron 787 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-2
eDP-+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVO-+
CRT-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron 787.

PCIe versionn/a2.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 February 2017 1 July 2011
Physical cores 8 1
Threads 16 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 17 Watt

Ryzen 7 1700X has an age advantage of 5 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 787, on the other hand, has 458.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron 787. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen 7 1700X is a desktop processor while Celeron 787 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron 787, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Ryzen 7 1700X
Intel Celeron 787
Celeron 787

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 736 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 1700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 787 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 1700X or Celeron 787, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.