Xeon Gold 5415+ vs Ryzen 7 1700

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 1700
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
9.33
Xeon Gold 5415+
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 150 Watt
15.71
+68.4%

Xeon Gold 5415+ outperforms Ryzen 7 1700 by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Gold 5415+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking816428
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.9534.59
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7no data
Power efficiency13.589.91
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date2 March 2017 (7 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329$1,076

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 5415+ has 776% better value for money than Ryzen 7 1700.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Gold 5415+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache768 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache16384 KB22.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Gold 5415+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketAM44677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Gold 5415+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA3-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
SenseMI+-

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Gold 5415+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Gold 5415+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Gold 5415+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Gold 5415+.

PCIe versionn/a5.0
PCI Express lanes2080

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 1700 9.33
Xeon Gold 5415+ 15.71
+68.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 1700 14813
Xeon Gold 5415+ 24951
+68.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.33 15.71
Recency 2 March 2017 10 January 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 150 Watt

Ryzen 7 1700 has 130.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5415+, on the other hand, has a 68.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 5415+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 1700 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 1700 is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 5415+ is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 1700 and Xeon Gold 5415+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Ryzen 7 1700
Intel Xeon Gold 5415+
Xeon Gold 5415+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1527 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5415 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 1700 or Xeon Gold 5415+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.