Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs Ryzen 7 1700

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 1700
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
9.32
+112%
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.40

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G by a whopping 112% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 1700 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8221345
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.98no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency13.506.37
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date2 March 2017 (7 years ago)30 September 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 1700 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed3 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3036
L1 cache768 KB384 KB
L2 cache4096 KB2 MB
L3 cache16384 KB4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die size192 mm2209.78 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 1700 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4Socket AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA3-
AVX++
SenseMI+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon Vega 8

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G.

PCIe versionn/a3.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 1700 9.32
+112%
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G 4.40

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 1700 14808
+112%
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G 6989

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.32 4.40
Recency 2 March 2017 30 September 2019
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm

Ryzen 7 1700 has a 111.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 1700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 1700 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Ryzen 7 1700
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1540 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 146 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 1700 or Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.