Atom Z2560 vs Ryzen 7 1700
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Atom Z2560 by a whopping 3957% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 1700 and Atom Z2560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 816 | 3170 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.95 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 7 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 13.58 | 7.26 |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Clovertrail (2013) |
| Release date | 2 March 2017 (7 years ago) | 27 February 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 1700 and Atom Z2560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 30 | no data |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16384 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | 65 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 140 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 1700 and Atom Z2560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | FC-MB4760 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 3 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Atom Z2560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | FMA3 | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| Smart Idle | no data | + |
| SenseMI | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Atom Z2560 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Atom Z2560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR2 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 2 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | 8.5 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | PowerVR SGX544MP2 (400 MHz) |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 7 1700 and Atom Z2560 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | - | 2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and Atom Z2560.
| PCIe version | n/a | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
| USB revision | no data | 2.0 OTG, USB-SPH 2.0 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 2 |
| UART | no data | 3 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
Geekbench 2
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.33 | 0.23 |
| Recency | 2 March 2017 | 27 February 2013 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 3 Watt |
Ryzen 7 1700 has a 3956.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.
Atom Z2560, on the other hand, has 2066.7% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 7 1700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z2560 in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 7 1700 is a desktop processor while Atom Z2560 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 1700 and Atom Z2560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
