3020e vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
7.94
+419%

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U outperforms 3020e by a whopping 419% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and 3020e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9502137
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency50.0924.13
Architecture codenameRenoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020)Dali (Zen) (2020)
Release date7 May 2020 (4 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and 3020e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache384 KB192 KB
L2 cache3 MB1 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography7 nm14 nm
Die size156 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors9800 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and 3020e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP6FT5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and 3020e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsPRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and 3020e are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and 3020e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and 3020e.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 7.94
+419%
3020e 1.53

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 12616
+419%
3020e 2433

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 1313
+98.6%
3020e 661

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 4594
+326%
3020e 1079

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 1161
+492%
3020e 196

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 175
+90.2%
3020e 92

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 5.4
+391%
3020e 1.1

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 3795
+208%
3020e 1232

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 4649
+291%
3020e 1188

Blender(-)

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 429
3020e 2964
+592%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 1071
+67.9%
3020e 638

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 4223
+62.6%
3020e 2597

7-Zip

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 31980
+544%
3020e 4963

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 186
+77.1%
3020e 105

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.94 1.53
Integrated graphics card 6.04 2.98
Recency 7 May 2020 4 August 2020
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 6 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U has a 419% higher aggregate performance score, 102.7% faster integrated GPU, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

3020e, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and 150% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U is our recommended choice as it beats the 3020e in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and 3020e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
AMD 3020e
3020e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 251 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 815 votes

Rate 3020e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U or 3020e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.