EPYC 9654P vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
10.18
EPYC 9654P
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
72.13
+609%

EPYC 9654P outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G by a whopping 609% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and EPYC 9654P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7677
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.01
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD EPYC
Power efficiency14.8218.96
Architecture codenameRenoir (2020−2023)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date21 July 2020 (4 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$10,625

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and EPYC 9654P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)96
Threads12192
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Multiplier3724
L1 cache384 KB6 MB
L2 cache3 MB96 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size156 mm212x 72 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors9800 Million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and EPYC 9654P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and EPYC 9654P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and EPYC 9654P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and EPYC 9654P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size128 GB6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Vega 7no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and EPYC 9654P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 10.18
EPYC 9654P 72.13
+609%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 16171
EPYC 9654P 114570
+608%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.18 72.13
Recency 21 July 2020 10 November 2022
Physical cores 6 96
Threads 12 192
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 360 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G has 453.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9654P, on the other hand, has a 608.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9654P is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is a desktop processor while EPYC 9654P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G and EPYC 9654P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
AMD EPYC 9654P
EPYC 9654P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1626 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 9 votes

Rate EPYC 9654P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G or EPYC 9654P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.