Ryzen 3 7320U vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.58
Ryzen 3 7320U
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
5.78
+26.2%

Ryzen 3 7320U outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Ryzen 3 7320U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13271142
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Power efficiency27.8435.14
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2022)Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022)
Release date8 April 2019 (5 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Ryzen 3 7320U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache384 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm6 nm
Die size209.78 mm2100 mm2
Number of transistors4940 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Ryzen 3 7320U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5FP6
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Ryzen 3 7320U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Ryzen 3 7320U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Ryzen 3 7320U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)AMD Radeon 610M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Ryzen 3 7320U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes124

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 4.58
Ryzen 3 7320U 5.78
+26.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 7011
Ryzen 3 7320U 8841
+26.1%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 913
Ryzen 3 7320U 1157
+26.7%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 2634
Ryzen 3 7320U 3613
+37.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.58 5.78
Integrated graphics card 4.50 2.85
Recency 8 April 2019 20 September 2022
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U has 57.9% faster integrated GPU.

Ryzen 3 7320U, on the other hand, has a 26.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 3 7320U is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Ryzen 3 7320U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
AMD Ryzen 3 7320U
Ryzen 3 7320U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 141 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 664 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 7320U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U or Ryzen 3 7320U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.