FX-8350 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and FX-8350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	1122	1472
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.78
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Series	AMD Ryzen 5	AMD FX-Series (Desktop)
Power efficiency	8.33	2.83
Architecture codename	Zen+ (2018−2019)	Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date	30 September 2019 (5 years ago)	23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and FX-8350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	8 (Octa-Core)
Threads	8	8
Base clock speed	3.7 GHz	4 GHz
Boost clock speed	4.2 GHz	4.2 GHz
Bus type	PCIe 3.0	no data
Multiplier	37	no data
L1 cache	384 KB	no data
L2 cache	2 MB	8192 KB
L3 cache	4 MB	no data
Chip lithography	12 nm	32 nm
Die size	no data	315 mm2
Maximum core temperature	no data	61 °C
Number of transistors	4940 Million	1,200 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	-
Unlocked multiplier	-	+
P0 Vcore voltage	no data	Min: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and FX-8350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	Socket AM4	AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and FX-8350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.1
AES-NI	+	+
FMA	-	+
AVX	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and FX-8350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and FX-8350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2933	DDR3
Maximum memory size	64 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	46.933 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and FX-8350.

PCIe version	3.0	n/a
PCI Express lanes	20	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	5.94	3.88
Recency	30 September 2019	23 October 2012
Physical cores	4	8
Chip lithography	12 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	125 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and FX-8350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---