EPYC 7502P vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
8.80
EPYC 7502P
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
33.21
+277%

EPYC 7502P outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 by a whopping 277% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and EPYC 7502P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking884125
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.78
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD EPYC
Power efficiency12.3516.82
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date6 September 2018 (6 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,300

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and EPYC 7502P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads1264
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.35 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3425
L1 cache576 KB2 MB
L2 cache3 MB16 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size213 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors4800 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and EPYC 7502P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and EPYC 7502P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and EPYC 7502P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and EPYC 7502P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and EPYC 7502P.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 8.80
EPYC 7502P 33.21
+277%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 13465
EPYC 7502P 50818
+277%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 1175
+19.9%
EPYC 7502P 980

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 4742
EPYC 7502P 8092
+70.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.80 33.21
Recency 6 September 2018 7 August 2019
Physical cores 6 32
Threads 12 64
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 180 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 has 176.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7502P, on the other hand, has a 277.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, 433.3% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7502P is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7502P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and EPYC 7502P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
AMD EPYC 7502P
EPYC 7502P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 175 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7502P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 or EPYC 7502P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.