Atom N280 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
8.48
+8380%
Atom N280
2009
1 core / 2 threads, 2 Watt
0.10

Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 outperforms Atom N280 by a whopping 8380% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Atom N280 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9023383
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Intel Atom
Power efficiency12.353.79
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)DiamondVille (2008−2009)
Release date6 September 2018 (6 years ago)1 February 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Atom N280 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.4 GHz1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz0.07 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s666.66 MT/s
Multiplier3410
L1 cache576 KB56 KB
L2 cache3 MB512 KB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography12 nm45 nm
Die size213 mm225.9638 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors4800 Million47 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Atom N280 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt2.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Atom N280. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Atom N280 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Atom N280 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Atom N280. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelno data
Maximum memory size64 GB8 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card--

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Atom N280.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 8.48
+8380%
Atom N280 0.10

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 13465
+8476%
Atom N280 157

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.48 0.10
Recency 6 September 2018 1 February 2009
Physical cores 6 1
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 12 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 2 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 has a 8380% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

Atom N280, on the other hand, has 3150% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom N280 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is a desktop processor while Atom N280 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Atom N280, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
Intel Atom N280
Atom N280

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 177 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 30 votes

Rate Atom N280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 or Atom N280, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.