Ryzen 5 7520C vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE and Ryzen 5 7520C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1242 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | AMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) |
| Power efficiency | 13.06 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raven Ridge (2017−2018) | Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 10 May 2018 (6 years ago) | 23 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE and Ryzen 5 7520C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Multiplier | 32 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | 210 mm2 | 100 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,950 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE and Ryzen 5 7520C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | FT6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE and Ryzen 5 7520C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE and Ryzen 5 7520C are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE and Ryzen 5 7520C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | AMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE and Ryzen 5 7520C.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 5.47 | 2.85 |
| Recency | 10 May 2018 | 23 May 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE has 91.9% faster integrated GPU.
Ryzen 5 7520C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE and Ryzen 5 7520C. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 7520C is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE and Ryzen 5 7520C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
