FX-7600P vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.57
+230%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G outperforms FX-7600P by a whopping 230% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and FX-7600P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11582073
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.21no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD Kaveri
Power efficiency7.814.40
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date12 February 2018 (6 years ago)4 June 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and FX-7600P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rateno dataBGA (FP3)
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache128K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size210 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors4,950 million2,410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and FX-7600P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FP3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and FX-7600P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and FX-7600P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and FX-7600P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3-2133
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data8
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and FX-7600P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and FX-7600P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and FX-7600P.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G 5.57
+230%
FX-7600P 1.69

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G 8517
+230%
FX-7600P 2582

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.57 1.69
Recency 12 February 2018 4 June 2014
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G has a 229.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

FX-7600P, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-7600P in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is a desktop processor while FX-7600P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and FX-7600P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
AMD FX-7600P
FX-7600P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 174 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 11 votes

Rate FX-7600P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G or FX-7600P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.