EPYC 75F3 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.47
EPYC 75F3
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
43.95
+703%

EPYC 75F3 outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G by a whopping 703% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and EPYC 75F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking116351
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.815.93
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD EPYC
Power efficiency7.8214.58
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date12 February 2018 (6 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169$4,860

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 75F3 has 2% better value for money than Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and EPYC 75F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads864
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.95 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4 GHz
Multiplier3629.5
L1 cache128K (per core)2 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)16 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die size210 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors4,950 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and EPYC 75F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketAM4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and EPYC 75F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and EPYC 75F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and EPYC 75F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size64 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 11N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and EPYC 75F3.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes12128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G 5.47
EPYC 75F3 43.95
+703%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G 8532
EPYC 75F3 68505
+703%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.47 43.95
Recency 12 February 2018 12 January 2021
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 8 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 280 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G has 330.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 75F3, on the other hand, has a 703.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 75F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is a desktop processor while EPYC 75F3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and EPYC 75F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
AMD EPYC 75F3
EPYC 75F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 174 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 75F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G or EPYC 75F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.